Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Blobal Warming and Modern Capitalism

Dear Friends-
I have just read one of the most vivid messages about the dangerous state of our world and how it is intertwined with the system we are living under from James Speth, Co-Founder, in 1970, of the National Resources Defense Council. The palliatives that we have been using to contain this problem in recent years have clearly not been working. Instead, fundamental change is in order. One of the things he calls for is a cooperative response from environmental, social justice, democracy, and peace activists. This is something that we have been talking about in San Diego for some time. I pass it on to you for your consideration.
The following is an excerpt that includes prescriptive recommendations that the new Obama Administration needs to hear about::

"There are many steps to slow growth while improving social and
environmental well-being, such as: shorter workweeks and longer vacations;
greater labor protections, job security and benefits; restrictions on
advertising; a new design for the twenty-first-century corporation; strong
social and environmental provisions in trade agreements; rigorous environmental
and consumer protection, including full-cost pricing; greater economic and
social equality, with progressive taxation of the rich and greater income
support for the poor; heavy spending on public services and environmental
amenities; a huge investment in education, skills and new technology; and
initiatives to address population growth at home and abroad."

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081006/speth

Yours for a more positive future, John
_______________________
John P. Falchi
___________________________________________________________________________


GLOBAL WARMING & MODERN CAPITALISM
By James Gustave Speth
________________________________________________________________________

This article appeared in the October 6, 2008 edition of The Nation.
It is adapted from James Gustave Speth's The Bridge at the Edge
of the World: Capitalism, the Environment, and Crossing From Crisis to
Sustainability
(Yale).

In 1970 James Gustave Speth co-founded the Natural Resources Defense
Council
, which has become one of America's most well-endowed and
high-profile environmental organizations. He worked in the White House
under President Carter, chairing the Council on Environmental Quality; when
Bill Clinton and Al Gore were elected in 1992, Speth was a senior adviser to their
transition team. He spent the 1990s as the administrator of the United Nations
Development Program, where he integrated environmental sustainability into the
agency's poverty-fighting mission. Thus, what follows--his call for a radical
departure from the movement's current strategy--comes from the ultimate
environmental insider. --The Editors
_______________________________________________________________________

Environmentalists must learn to join forces with other agents of change.
By James Gustave Speth
________________________________________________________________________

I grew up in a small town on the Edisto River in South Carolina in the
1940s and '50s. As a boy, I often swam the Edisto, though at first I could
not buck the river's current. But as I grew older and stronger, I was able to
make good headway against it. In my environmental work for close to four decades, I've always assumed America's environmental community would do
the same--get stronger and prevail against the current. But in the past few years I have come to the conclusion that this assumption is incorrect. The environmental
community
has grown in strength and sophistication, but the environment has continued to deteriorate. The current has strengthened faster than we have and become more treacherous. It is time to consider what to do besides swimming against it.

It is no accident that environmental crisis is gathering as social injustice is deepening and growing inequality is impairing democratic institutions. Each is
the result of a system of political economy--today's capitalism--that is profoundly committed to profits and growth and profoundly indifferent to nature and society. Left uncorrected, it is an inherently ruthless, rapacious system, and it is up to citizens, acting mainly through government, to inject human and natural values into that system. But this effort fails because progressive politics are too feeble and Washington is more and more in the hands of powerful corporations and great wealth. The best hope for change in America is a fusion of those concerned about the environment, social justice and strong democracy into one powerful progressive force. This fusion must occur before it is too late.

Sadly, while environmentalists have been winning many battles, we are
losing the planet. Half the world's tropical and temperate forests are
gone. The rate of deforestation in the tropics is about an acre a second.
Half the planet's wetlands are gone. An estimated 90 percent of the large
predator fish are gone and 75 percent of marine fisheries are overfished,
fished to capacity or depleted, up from 5 percent a few decades ago. Twenty
percent of the corals are gone; another 20 percent severely threatened. Species
are disappearing about 1,000 times faster than normal. The planet has not seen
such a spasm of extinction in 65 million years, since the dinosaurs
disappeared.
Each year desertification claims a Nebraska-sized area of productive capacity
worldwide. Toxic chemicals can be found by the dozens in essentially every one
of us.

Earth's ozone layer was severely depleted before the change was discovered.
Human activities have pushed atmospheric carbon dioxide levels up by more
than a third and have started the most dangerous change of all--planetary
warming and climate disruption. Earth's ice fields are melting. Industrial
processes are fixing nitrogen, making it biologically active, at a rate equal to
nature's; one result is the development of hundreds of dead zones in the oceans because of overfertilization. Withdrawals of fresh water consume more than half
of accessible runoff, and water shortages are multiplying here and abroad. The
following rivers no longer reach the oceans in the dry season: the Colorado,
Yellow, Ganges and Nile, among many others.

The United States--responsible for about 30 percent of the carbon dioxide
added to the atmosphere--is, of course, deeply complicit in these global
trends, and four decades of environmental effort have not stemmed the tide of
decline. The United States is losing 6,000 acres of open space every day, and
100,000 acres of wetlands every year. Forty percent of US fish species are
threatened with extinction, a third of plants and amphibians, 15 to 20 percent
of birds and mammals. Half of US lakes and a third of the rivers still fail to
meet the standards that the 1972 Clean Water Act said should be met by 1983,
and a third of Americans live in counties that fail to meet EPA air-quality
standards. We have done little to curb our wasteful energy habits or our steady
population growth
.

All we have to do to destroy the planet's climate and biota and leave a
ruined world to our children and grandchildren is to keep doing exactly
what we are doing, with no growth in the human population or the world
economy. Just continue to release greenhouse gases at current rates,
impoverish ecosystems and release toxic chemicals at current rates, and the
world in the latter part of this century won't be fit to live in. But human
activities are not holding at current levels--they are accelerating
dramatically.

The world economy has more than quadrupled since 1960 and is projected to
quadruple again by mid century. At recent rates of growth, it will double
in fifteen to seventeen years. It took all of human history to grow the $7
trillion world economy of 1950. We now grow by that amount in a decade.
Societies face the prospect of enormous environmental deterioration just when
they need to be moving strongly in the opposite direction.

The escalating processes of climate disruption, biotic impoverishment and
toxification--which continue despite decades of warnings and earnest
effort--are a severe indictment of capitalism. Capitalism as it is
constituted today produces an economy and politics that are highly
destructive to the environment. An unquestioning commitment to economic
growth at any cost, powerful corporations whose overriding objective is to grow
by generating profits (including profits from avoiding the environmental costs
they create, from amassing deep subsidies and benefits from government and from continued deployment of technologies designed with little regard for the
environment), markets that fail to recognize environmental costs unless
corrected by government, government that is subservient to corporate interests
and the growth imperative, rampant consumerism spurred by sophisticated
advertising and marketing, economic activity so large in scale that it alters
the fundamental biophysical operations of the planet--all combine to deliver an
ever growing world economy that is undermining the ability of the planet to
sustain life.

Mainstream environmentalism has proved largely incapable of coping with
these forces. It works within the system--raising public awareness,
offering responsive policies, lobbying and litigating. America has run a
forty-year experiment on whether this environmentalism can succeed, and the
results are in. The full burden of managing accumulating environmental threats
has fallen to the environmental community, both in and outside government. But
that burden is too great. The system of modern capitalism will grow in size and
complexity and will generate ever larger environmental consequences,
outstripping efforts to cope with them. Indeed, the system will seek to
undermine those efforts and constrain them within narrow limits. Working only
within the system will, in the end, not succeed. Transformative change in the
system itself is needed.

The fundamental questions thus are about transforming capitalism as we know it.
Can it be done? If so, how? And if not, what then? The good news is that there
are a variety of prescriptions to take the economy and the environment off a
collision course and to transform economic activity into something benign and
restorative. The most important of these prescriptions range far beyond the
traditional environmental agenda.

Market failure can be corrected by government, perverse subsidies can be
eliminated and environmentally honest prices can be forged. The laws,
incentives and governance structures under which corporations operate can
be transformed to move from shareholder primacy to stakeholder primacy. But
even more vital is the need to challenge economic growth and the consumerism it
depends on. This challenge is as relevant to addressing social problems as
environmental ones.

The never-ending drive to grow the economy undermines families, jobs,
communities, the environment, a sense of place and continuity, even
national security--but we are told that, in the end, we will somehow be
better off. America has not applied its growth dividend to meeting social
and environmental needs. There is good evidence that increased incomes do
not lead to greater satisfaction with life. In affluent countries we have
what might be called uneconomic growth, to borrow Herman Daly's phrase,
where, if one could total up all the costs of growth, they would outweigh
the benefits.

Overriding commitment to economic growth--mere GDP growth--is consuming
environmental and social capital, both in short supply. Affluent countries must
become postgrowth societies where jobs and work life, the environment,
communities and the public sector are no longer sacrificed to push up GDP.

There are many steps to slow growth while improving social and
environmental well-being, such as: shorter workweeks and longer vacations;
greater labor protections, job security and benefits; restrictions on
advertising; a new design for the twenty-first-century corporation; strong
social and environmental provisions in trade agreements; rigorous environmental
and consumer protection, including full-cost pricing; greater economic and
social equality, with progressive taxation of the rich and greater income
support for the poor; heavy spending on public services and environmental
amenities; a huge investment in education, skills and new technology; and
initiatives to address population growth at home and abroad.

James Gustave Speth, dean of the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental
Studies, is the author of The Bridge at the Edge of the World: Capitalism, the
Environment, and Crossing From Crisis to Sustainability (Yale)


No comments:

The Hidden Enemy

Healing

Healing
Healing

Corruption

Corruption
Corruption in the Senate

Compassion

Compassion
Compassion

Raise the Minimum Wage

Raise the Minimum Wage

Capitolism

Capitolism

Hypocrits

Hypocrits

My New Book About Sudan

Ceasar's Messiah Movie Trailer

The Dark Side of Coffee Trade

Miko Peled "The General's Son" Exposes Israeli Lies

Are these Your Heros?

Are these Your Heros?

National shame

National shame

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

Stephen Fry on Catholisism

Juanita Ayson on Accupuncture

Interview with Congressman Filner

Free Trade Enslaves Us All

Blog Archive

Farouk Al Nasser

Farouk Al Nasser
Farouk Al Nasser at NCCPJ

Victor Calle

Victor Calle
At NCCP April 2008

Gore Vidal and Floyd Morrow

Gore Vidal and Floyd Morrow
April Fundraiser in San Diego

Tanja and Cindy Sheehan

Tanja and Cindy Sheehan
Fund raiser for Cindy April 2008

CITN

CITN
The Citizens' Internet Television Network

CITRad

CITRad
The Citizens' Internet Radio Network

Save America

Save America
Save America

Fighting

Fighting
Fighting

Believe

Believe
Believe

We Are All One

We Are All One
We Are All One

Secular Humanism

Secular Humanism
Secular Humanism

Change the System

Change the System
Change the System

A Lie Does Not Become the Truth

A Lie Does Not Become the Truth
A lie does not become the truth

Coexist

Coexist
Coexist

Bankers

Bankers
Bankers

Fetus Rights

Fetus Rights
Fetus Rights

The Earth Was Created

The Earth Was Created
The Earth Was Created

Lessons

Lessons
Lessons