SAN DIEGO – Citizens' Oversight Project activist Raymond Lutz asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wednesday to hold a formal hearing on changes to Southern California Edison's license for the San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant.
Before a panel of lawyers and board members at the NRC headquarters in Maryland, Lutz appeared via video conference and argued the changes to the frequency of hundreds of inspections would keep the public out of the loop.
"Edison wants to try to keep hearings from happening and that makes it so the public cannot watch them," said Lutz. "They want to run the plant the way they want."
Lawyers from the NRC staff and Edison argued against a hearing. They said Lutz missed the deadline to file and they also argued Lutz has no right to demand a hearing because he doesn't live near the plant.
Edison's attorney also argued the change was meant to give Edison more flexibility in order to run the plant more efficiently. Lutz disagrees.
"But this means the NRC doesn't get reports if they change it and the NRC doesn't get to regulate," said Lutz
The NRC board is expected to make a decision in January whether to grant a full hearing on the changes.
[Go to the link above to listen to the radio program coverage, which was better than the piece above.]
Citizen activist makes his case about San Onofre to Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Kitty Felde | December 5th, 2012, 3:58pm
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board heard a request Wednesday regarding Southern California Edison's operating license for the San Onofre nuclear power plant.
It was a lesson in fighting city hall — or, in this case, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
An activist engineer from Southern California tried Wednesday to convince the NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board to hold a formal hearing on changes to Southern California Edison's operating license for the San Onofre nuclear power plant. The Commission did not go easy on Edison.
Inside the Maryland hearing room at commission headquarters, it was a sea of suits — lawyers, nuclear engineers, and NRC board members.
Back in California, appearing via videoconference, activist Ray Lutz said amendments to San Onofre's license would allow Edison to change the frequency of hundreds of critical inspections, hiding them in documents controlled by the utility company.
"No public review, no opportunity for a hearing, no checking that anything is going right," said Lutz, pointing out the potential for mistakes. "It helps to have the public reviewing this stuff."
Lawyers for both the NRC staff and Edison argued against scheduling a full hearing, saying Lutz missed the deadline to file paperwork and had no standing to demand a hearing since he lives in El Cajon — too far away to be affected by safety issues at the plant.
Edison attorneys insisted changes in surveillance frequency would still be subject to oversight. But Alex Karlin, an administrative law judge on the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, pointed out to Edison attorney Steven Frantz that under the amended operating license, the utility would no longer be required to report changes to the NRC. Karlin kept asking whether that results in a relaxation of oversight. "Yes or no?" he asked several times.
Frantz said the change was meant to give a licensee more flexibility: "That's the whole purpose."
Karlin kept pushing. Finally, Frantz agreed, saying, "Yeah, we are no longer required to get NRC approval."
The NRC board will decide in January whether to grant a full hearing on changes to Edison's operating license for San Onofre.
Separately, the NRC is also reviewing Edison's proposal to restart one of the reactors at the nuclear plant, which has been offline since January.
-- ----------------------- Ray Lutz Citizens' Oversight CitizensOversight.org 619-820-5321
ShutSanOnofre mailing list
To subscribe/unsubscribe/manage settings: